#86908: "Able to go back after playing Assertion card and seeing what Base Conservation Project opponent took"
Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?
Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah
Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah
Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama
Jika ya, sila nyatakan untuk laporan ini. Laporan dengan undian yang paling diberikan PRIORITI!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Penerangan yang terperinci
-
• Sila salin/tampal mesej masalah yang anda dapat lihat di skrin, jika ada.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Tolong jelaskan apa yang anda ingin buat, apa yang telah anda buat dan apa yang telah terjadi
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Tolong salin/lekat teks yang dipaparkan dalam bahasa inggeris dan bukannya bahasa anda. Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Adakah teks ini tersedia dalam sistem terjemahan ? Jika ya, adakah ia diterjemahkan selama lebih daripada 24 jam?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Tolong jelaskan cadangan anda dengan tepat dan ringkas supaya semudah mungkin untuk memahami apa yang anda maksudkan.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Apa yang dipaparkan pada skrin apabila anda disekat (Skrin kosong? Antara muka permainan? Mesej ralat?)
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Bahagian peraturan yang mana tidak dihormati oleh penyesuaian BGA
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Adakah kelanggaran peraturan boleh dilihat di ulangan permainan? Jikanya ya, pada langkah berapa?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Apakan tindakan yang anda mahu lakukan?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Apa yang anda cuba lakukan untuk mencetuskan tindakan permainan ini?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
-
• Apa yang berlaku apabila anda cuba melakukan ini (mesej ralat, mesej bar status permainan, ...)?
• Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Pada peringkat mana semasa permainan , masalah itu berlaku (apakah arahan semasa permainan tersebut)?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Apa yang berlaku apabila anda cuba melakukan tindakan permainan (mesej ralat, mesej bar status permainan, ...)?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Tolong jelaskan masalah pemaparan. Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Tolong salin/lekat teks yang dipaparkan dalam bahasa inggeris dan bukannya bahasa anda. Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Adakah teks ini tersedia dalam sistem terjemahan ? Jika ya, adakah ia diterjemahkan selama lebih daripada 24 jam?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Tolong jelaskan cadangan anda dengan tepat dan ringkas supaya semudah mungkin untuk memahami apa yang anda maksudkan.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Apakah browser anda?
Google Chrome v112
Laporan masa lalu
The second player to do so should NOT be able to do a take-back if the Conservation Project card is still in the opponent's hand.
I dunno where a discarded base conservation project goes to.
The discard pile? Back to the base conservation projects pile to be potentially drawn again?
My intuition is that it goes into a separate discard pile for Base Conservation Projects.
I feel this way because that's what I do with final scoring cards in a 4 player game, which becomes relevant when both cards with Resistance get played, and resultantly, during the course of the game we need to draw more Final Scoring cards than exist in the deck.
Note that this could result in the top of the discard deck showing a different back in rare cases, and players just need to do a random selection method (such as shuffling) without looking -- the same as pilfering from a hand that contains a base conservation project.
About your main point, it does seem to me that the second player shouldn't get a take-back because they can deduce the taken conservation project. However, it is a very minor edge case:
* Two DIFFERENT players must both get Assertion animals (there are only two of these in the game).
* The second player must play their Assertion animal before the first player plays their project.
* Even if this very rare case happens, in most cases I suspect it is obvious which project the first player wants, e.g. they have 4 Asia icons and the Asia project is not visible.
I think perhaps this bug is not fixed
Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini
- ID meja yang lain / gerakkan ID
- Adakah F5 meyelesaikan masalah ity?
- Adapah masalah itu berlaku beberapa kali? Selalu? Sekali-sekala?
- Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
