Lapor • Board Game Arena

Semua Laporan

riichimahjong_displayed melaporkan

#46537: "Cannot know whether discarded tile is just drawn tile or a tile from hand"

implemented: Cadangan ini telah dilaksanakan

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

riichimahjong #193940433

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Cadangan: Pada pendapat saya, perkara berikut akan sangat meningkatkan pelaksanaan permainan

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Cadangan: Pada pendapat saya, perkara berikut akan sangat meningkatkan pelaksanaan permainan

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Jika ya, sila nyatakan untuk laporan ini. Laporan dengan undian yang paling diberikan PRIORITI!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Aug 13 th 2021 23:04 • ufm • Bug belum dihasilkan semula oleh pembanguna:

Aug 16 th 2021 19:02 • GTSchemer • Bug belum dihasilkan semula oleh pembanguna:

As a point of comparison, FFXIV implements dark grey to indicate a drawn tile was immediately discarded: i.ytimg.com/vi/qEOJ6rP08gA/maxresdefault.jpg

Normal white tiles indicate a discard from the hand that was NOT the newly drawn tile.

Also, FFXIV uses a red coloring to indicate a discarded tile was called by another player.

Aug 17 th 2021 00:40 • gilthe • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Thanks for the info! In physical play, you can see of course which actual tile was discarded irrespective of discard or not. At the same time, nothing enforces hand-sorting in physical play, but it would be really inconvenient to not have it online. I think Tenhou shows discard identity but does not enforce shuffling, does anybody know for suret?
I don't have a complete overview, but it seems to me that clients are not homogeneous in this regard. Iirc the Yakuza 0 implementation obscures it completely. For me it was fine to obscure completely, but a second option could be added as suggested (distinguish discard of draw from all other cases), either graphically or by notification.I don't think this is a bug, though.

Aug 17 th 2021 00:40 • gilthe • Pemaju bersetuju bahawa ia adalah idea yang baik dan berhasrat untuk mengatasinya:

I reclassified this from bug to suggestion.

Aug 17 th 2021 00:40 • gilthe • Pemaju bersetuju bahawa ia adalah idea yang baik dan berhasrat untuk mengatasinya:

I reclassified this from bug to suggestion.

Aug 17 th 2021 00:47 • GTSchemer • Pemaju bersetuju bahawa ia adalah idea yang baik dan berhasrat untuk mengatasinya:

I agree it is a suggestion. I do not know about Tenhou, but in general I think having a grey coloring to indicate drawn tiles being discarded would be fair and not cause problems.

It is useful because if you see several grey discards in a row, you suspect someone is mostly happy with their hand, and is looking for something in particular.

Aug 17 th 2021 03:44 • ufm • Pemaju bersetuju bahawa ia adalah idea yang baik dan berhasrat untuk mengatasinya:

Yakuza 0 (the one developer mentioned), tenhou, and majsoul does not shade tiles discarded just after being drawn, however they indicate it by animation.
When a player draws a tile, the tile is placed on the rightmost side. If the tile is discarded it does not shuffled in. If kept, it gets shuffled in hand and another tile is discarded from hand.
Tenhou and majsoul display the information only during the replay though. I think that's why the developer thought it shows the identity during the game (found the screenshot or video but didn't know it being a replay).
FFXIV (the one GTSchemer brought) and SEGA MJ applies shading during the game.

To sum up, it is quite inconsistent but all clients/implementations notify the information in a manner.

Aug 17 th 2021 17:23 • gilthe • Pemaju bersetuju bahawa ia adalah idea yang baik dan berhasrat untuk mengatasinya:

Thanks @ufm, that's helpful.

I had indeed seen both live play and replay on tenhou in video before but confused the two last night (was late ;-)

Aug 17 th 2021 17:27 • GTSchemer • Pemaju bersetuju bahawa ia adalah idea yang baik dan berhasrat untuk mengatasinya:

Nice summary ufm! Of those options, the shading is the most async-friendly, but I'm not against animation as well if it's not overdone. I would just be afraid I'd miss it when I load up an async game.

Aug 31 st 2021 02:08 • nccc • Pemaju bersetuju bahawa ia adalah idea yang baik dan berhasrat untuk mengatasinya:

And could u HIGHLIGHT the card just discarded as well, ty!

Sep 25 th 2021 01:12 • gilthe • Cadangan ini telah dilaksanakan:

I implemented both source-of-tile highlighting (fresh draw or already in hand) and highlighting of the current active discard. Note that if automatic pass options are set, you might not see the current active discard highlighting because the tile is no longer claimable. The source of the tile is also reported in the notifications.

Sep 25 th 2021 04:10 • ufm • Cadangan ini telah dilaksanakan:

The log works well, but source-of-tile highlighting is somehow not applied even without autopass.

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Sila tambahkan di sini apa-apa yang kelihatan relevan untuk menghasilkan semula bug ini atau memahami cadangan anda:

ID meja yang lain / gerakkan ID
Adakah F5 meyelesaikan masalah ity?
Adapah masalah itu berlaku beberapa kali? Selalu? Sekali-sekala?
Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.

Batal Kemaskinikan laporan

#46537: "Cannot know whether discarded tile is just drawn tile or a tile from hand"

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Tukar status laporan kepada:

Tolong

Menyumbang

Navigasi

Ikut kita