Lapor • Board Game Arena

Semua Laporan

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game melaporkan

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

notabug: Ini tidak merupakan gangguan

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game #129404798

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Peraturan: sebuah peraturan permainan ini tidak dihormati

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Peraturan: sebuah peraturan permainan ini tidak dihormati

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Jika ya, sila nyatakan untuk laporan ini. Laporan dengan undian yang paling diberikan PRIORITI!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Dec 7 th 2020 04:01 • TheRandy • Bug belum dihasilkan semula oleh pembanguna:

The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner.
We both had 4 districts.
We both controlled 1 swing county.
The game assigned the victory to the other payer:
(blue) Forevergm 4 (2)
(red) TheRandy 4 (1)

The output message was: "Number of swing counties won"-
there are only 2 swing counties in the game.

Looking at the rules: "On the rare occasion that there’s still a tie, go to the Supreme Court. Whichever tied player has the fewest total votes for their own party within their own districts wins." My count was: (it might be off a point of 2): 78 blue - 63 red.

Dec 7 th 2020 04:21 • gkz • Ini tidak merupakan gangguan:

In an `n` player game, there should be `n + 1` swing counties: the `n` 1 tokens for each color and the neutral 0 token.

In this particular game, the blue player won the red 1 and the blue 1 (looks like the red 1 was underneath a meeple). The red player won the neutral 0. Thus the game counted the swing counties correctly.

---

Note that with 2 players, it should be impossible to go to the Supreme Court (since the tie break is majority of the 3 swing counties). With more players, it's possible to have a tie in swing counties. However, in such a case, the game won't actually fall back to this Supreme Court rule, since that was never implemented :). It'll just say that both players ended up winning. I'm also not sure if BGA's framework will allow for multiple tiebreak conditions (just based on the structure of the config), but I could look into it if it becomes a problem.

Dec 23 rd 2020 18:46 • Scott_wmu • Ini tidak merupakan gangguan:

Per the notes above, it looked like the second tiebreaker was never coded (“Supreme Court”). We played a 4 player where is showed a shared victory even though Yellow was the victor per the rules (57 < 65 votes for own in own districts).

boardgamearena.com/table?table=132155273

Just pointing out an occurrence - not sure how often it happens.

Dec 23 rd 2020 19:35 • gkz • Ini tidak merupakan gangguan:

Thanks for the note! Could you actually open a suggestion bug about implementing supreme court? I don't think it'll happen that often, but would be better to track separately from this.

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Sila tambahkan di sini apa-apa yang kelihatan relevan untuk menghasilkan semula bug ini atau memahami cadangan anda:

ID meja yang lain / gerakkan ID
Adakah F5 meyelesaikan masalah ity?
Adapah masalah itu berlaku beberapa kali? Selalu? Sekali-sekala?
Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.

Batal Kemaskinikan laporan

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Tukar status laporan kepada:

Tolong

Menyumbang

Navigasi

Ikut kita