Lapor • Board Game Arena

Semua Laporan

Cribbage melaporkan

#19689: "Manual scoring + muggins variant (failing at scoring benefits the opponent)"

rejected: Pemaju berpendapat bahawa ia bukan idea yang baik atau nisbah kos / manfaat terlalu tinggi

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

Cribbage #96877362

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Cadangan: Pada pendapat saya, perkara berikut akan sangat meningkatkan pelaksanaan permainan

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Cadangan: Pada pendapat saya, perkara berikut akan sangat meningkatkan pelaksanaan permainan

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Jika ya, sila nyatakan untuk laporan ini. Laporan dengan undian yang paling diberikan PRIORITI!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Jun 22 nd 2020 08:55 • Alb1979 • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Suggestion

Jun 22 nd 2020 13:59 • MikeIsHere • Pemaju ingin maklumat lanjut mengenai cadangan ini:

Thank you for the suggestion and the testing.

I have been tossing around the idea of muggings,
There are a couple of issues I can't get around
First it would slow down the game as each player would have to wait for the count, and an extra "turn" in turn based games, but if both players agree to this style it is no big issue.

Another is the UI
BGA GuideLines state

II-2 Use left clic only● The whole game should be playable with only simple left button mouse clicks.● Context menus should not be used.●Dragndrop should be avoided (if you want to use it anyway, you should make a click basedalternative available).● Mouse icon must change on cliquable elements (« cursor:pointer » CSS property)..

So I would have to display a grid of 29 buttons (0-29) or of 3 buttons +/-/OK and the user would have to click up to 29 times (if they are lucky)

The final hurdle is the muggins themselves,
I would have to display this interface to both players all the time, if I only give the opponent an opportunity to correct the count when a miscount is done then that would tip the player off that something was miscounted.
Then how would each situation be handled

Player A | Player B
---------------------------
correct | correct -- this is easy
correct | higher -- should there be a penalty*
correct | lower -- **
lower | lower than Player A
lower | higher than Player A
higher | lower than Player A
higher | higher than Player A

*from section 10.4a of the American Cribbage College rule book
If the judges determine that the play
was not a muggins, the opponent will be awarded
the points taken as a penalty.

** 10.4a
If the true amount
of underpegging is determined to be other than
the amount originally claimed, the caller is entitled only to the lesser of the claimed or true
amounts. In no case shall the amount of points
awarded for muggins exceed the actual number
of holes that could have been pegged had the
scoring been correctly done.

www.cribbage.org/NewSite/rules/ACCRuleBook2016.pdf

I am open to any suggestions, especially variants that will give BGA players more ways to play, I just don't know how to overcome these hurdles. Please feel free to offer more feedback

Jun 23 rd 2020 14:32 • Alb1979 • Pemaju ingin maklumat lanjut mengenai cadangan ini:

Thanks for at least considering it! So i have no idea about programming, so I can't give you any feedback on that. But I was thinking of selecting the cards that form a pair/run/whatever that can be scored and then clicking on a button to validate, then selecting the cards that form the next thing that can be scored, and again clicking on validating. Then a button validate the whole scoring, so if there are points missing at that point, they are given to the opponent.

Sep 13 th 2020 05:48 • Nisterius • Pemaju ingin maklumat lanjut mengenai cadangan ini:

The way I've seen it in other apps is that you just click your card combos in sequence, and if you select a combo in the "real scoring list", it adds it in: Like, say,
4 - 5 - 5 - 6
You'd click
5 - 5 - "score" : +2 pair
4 - 5 - 6 - "score" : +2 15
4 - 5- 6 - "score" : +2 15
4 - 5- 6 - "score" : +3 run
4 - 5- 6 - "score" : +3 run

just selecting and clicking "score" the way you select and put in the crib.

have "score" and "done" in the action bar.

A "simplistic" muggins would be to just _give_ to the opponent anything they missed, without making her do anything!
Otherwise you could then just give them same UI to the opponent who would just click "done" or click the missing scoring things.

Sep 14 th 2020 12:01 • MikeIsHere • Pemaju ingin maklumat lanjut mengenai cadangan ini:

So what is the penalty for over clicking?

Oct 9 th 2020 20:30 • Nisterius • Pemaju ingin maklumat lanjut mengenai cadangan ini:

I just learned that there is no notification if there are further comments on a thread you've commented on, so I thought to check back. I'd say, no penalty for overclicking - maybe just only even enable the "score" button if a scoring combo is selected. So, nothing selected: <score> [done] (with score disabled.). Click 4-5-6, [score] [done] (click score, get your 2, all cards deselected). You'd have to reselect them all; and if you selected "too many" or a "non-combo" like "4-6" or something - again, <score> is disabled. You could "find your way to avoiding muggins" that way, yes, but only with "a lot of work" which is sort of like real life.

Sep 6 th 2023 01:29 • Jupiterninja • Pemaju ingin maklumat lanjut mengenai cadangan ini:

I know nothing about programming on BGA, but in relation to the buttons issue, can you not just have each player input the amount of points in a numbers-only text field? I see automatic text comparisons all the time in Just One and the Decrypto tie breaker.

Sep 27 th 2025 19:29 • crableybradtree • Pemaju berpendapat bahawa ia bukan idea yang baik atau nisbah kos / manfaat terlalu tinggi:

Muggins suggestions rejected due to complexity of implementation and slowing of game play.

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Sila tambahkan di sini apa-apa yang kelihatan relevan untuk menghasilkan semula bug ini atau memahami cadangan anda:

ID meja yang lain / gerakkan ID
Adakah F5 meyelesaikan masalah ity?
Adapah masalah itu berlaku beberapa kali? Selalu? Sekali-sekala?
Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.

Batal Kemaskinikan laporan

#19689: "Manual scoring + muggins variant (failing at scoring benefits the opponent)"

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Tukar status laporan kepada:

Tolong

Menyumbang

Navigasi

Ikut kita