#142853: "Conflict Fatigue dominance adjustment is not reset after Dominance Check"
Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?
Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah
Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah
Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama
Jika ya, sila nyatakan untuk laporan ini. Laporan dengan undian yang paling diberikan PRIORITI!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Penerangan yang terperinci
-
• Sila salin/tampal mesej masalah yang anda dapat lihat di skrin, jika ada.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Tolong jelaskan apa yang anda ingin buat, apa yang telah anda buat dan apa yang telah terjadi
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Tolong salin/lekat teks yang dipaparkan dalam bahasa inggeris dan bukannya bahasa anda. Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Adakah teks ini tersedia dalam sistem terjemahan ? Jika ya, adakah ia diterjemahkan selama lebih daripada 24 jam?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Tolong jelaskan cadangan anda dengan tepat dan ringkas supaya semudah mungkin untuk memahami apa yang anda maksudkan.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Apa yang dipaparkan pada skrin apabila anda disekat (Skrin kosong? Antara muka permainan? Mesej ralat?)
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Bahagian peraturan yang mana tidak dihormati oleh penyesuaian BGA
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Adakah kelanggaran peraturan boleh dilihat di ulangan permainan? Jikanya ya, pada langkah berapa?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Apakan tindakan yang anda mahu lakukan?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Apa yang anda cuba lakukan untuk mencetuskan tindakan permainan ini?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
-
• Apa yang berlaku apabila anda cuba melakukan ini (mesej ralat, mesej bar status permainan, ...)?
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Pada peringkat mana semasa permainan , masalah itu berlaku (apakah arahan semasa permainan tersebut)?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Apa yang berlaku apabila anda cuba melakukan tindakan permainan (mesej ralat, mesej bar status permainan, ...)?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Tolong jelaskan masalah pemaparan. Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Tolong salin/lekat teks yang dipaparkan dalam bahasa inggeris dan bukannya bahasa anda. Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Adakah teks ini tersedia dalam sistem terjemahan ? Jika ya, adakah ia diterjemahkan selama lebih daripada 24 jam?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
-
• Tolong jelaskan cadangan anda dengan tepat dan ringkas supaya semudah mungkin untuk memahami apa yang anda maksudkan.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Apakah browser anda?
Safari v17.6
Laporan masa lalu
Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini
- ID meja yang lain / gerakkan ID
- Adakah F5 meyelesaikan masalah ity?
- Adapah masalah itu berlaku beberapa kali? Selalu? Sekali-sekala?
- Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.
