Lapor • Board Game Arena

Semua Laporan

terraformingmars_displayed melaporkan

#108233: "House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"

rejected: Pemaju berpendapat bahawa ia bukan idea yang baik atau nisbah kos / manfaat terlalu tinggi

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

terraformingmars #453033785

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Cadangan: Pada pendapat saya, perkara berikut akan sangat meningkatkan pelaksanaan permainan

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Cadangan: Pada pendapat saya, perkara berikut akan sangat meningkatkan pelaksanaan permainan

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Jika ya, sila nyatakan untuk laporan ini. Laporan dengan undian yang paling diberikan PRIORITI!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Dec 22 nd 2023 18:44 • startrekchekov • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

it should be implemented as a game setup option (no defer).

Jan 26 th 2024 05:22 • Karlsen • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

It should be (very) optional, as it is against the actual rules of the game.

Feb 4 th 2024 17:57 • Supergravity • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

I agree this would be a nice rule-variance option, but it should not delay going to Beta or full release.

Feb 16 th 2024 17:38 • Mr_yoso • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

I agree that this should only be a (very) optional set up, as intentionally slowing down your moves is a feature of the game's design. some cards actively benefit from slowing your play, like if you get a bonus for played space cards, you may want to slow your play so that other players use their space cards first.

Mar 20 th 2024 05:53 • bananasplay • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Not a fan of implementing everyone's pet house rules, even if as a table option (because then players have more things to evaluate to ensure that they the table they're considering joining doesn't have any of these implemented). Consider this a downvote on the entire idea.

Mar 20 th 2024 14:54 • xspuipuke • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Consider me downvoting this too.

Mar 20 th 2024 16:13 • Corwin007 • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

I'd pretty much be against this one for the reasons already stated, I'd have to screen games to make sure the option is not on, and since it's not an official option I'd rather not see this implemented.

Mar 21 st 2024 16:19 • Lumin_S • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

I'm a big supporter of this house rule, and it does speed things up nicely without changing very much in the game. That said all house rule options would need publisher approval, so... anyone want to get in touch with the publisher and try to convince them it's a good idea?

Mar 24 th 2024 20:10 • UkaSpaceElevator • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Downvote

Mar 25 th 2024 23:23 • frotes • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

+1 this variant. It can make async play much better and detracts little from the play experience

of course this would be an optional setup choice

Mar 30 th 2024 14:46 • Victoria_La • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Report short description
"game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
changed to
"House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"

Apr 16 th 2024 17:48 • RoyalRook • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

+1, especially for turn base games. It can only improve the state of the play.

Apr 30 th 2024 00:57 • Shiny_Charizard • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

I guess as long as there is an option this shouldn't matter, but I will always vote against this.
It takes so much away from the game strategy, so much for no gain.

BGA already has fast turn options for those who feel like the game is too slow without it.

May 20 th 2024 12:48 • Grunman • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Downvote

Aug 7 th 2024 17:24 • Yahyra • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

I agree with 'downvote' for this. I suggest finding friends /like minded players and agreeing to play in this manner.

Aug 14 th 2024 12:52 • eggjasalat • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Downvote

Aug 17 th 2024 06:35 • ArchDevious • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

I love this, please. Small reduction in strategy for a huge increase in quality of play, especially for async game

Sep 12 th 2024 14:05 • tomcattomcat • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

No support.

Nov 4 th 2024 08:39 • perfectgeneral • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

This is against the letter and spirit of the rules. Down vote.

Nov 21 st 2024 09:39 • HelmsDeepSleeper • Cadangan ini belum dianalisa oleh pemaju:

Downvote. This is against the game rules

Sep 27 th 2025 18:46 • FrankJones • Pemaju berpendapat bahawa ia bukan idea yang baik atau nisbah kos / manfaat terlalu tinggi:

This is not how Terraform Mars is played.

Sep 29 th 2025 16:53 • frotes • Pemaju berpendapat bahawa ia bukan idea yang baik atau nisbah kos / manfaat terlalu tinggi:

that's a disappointing decision.

I would understand if dev didn't want to put in the work to add the option but to just say it isn't part of the game as the reason.. well it's suggested as a variant. One that has been used in even tournaments before

Having an option choice also does not impact any players that want to play the game with rules as written.

Oct 2 nd 2025 02:29 • happy-smile • Pemaju berpendapat bahawa ia bukan idea yang baik atau nisbah kos / manfaat terlalu tinggi:

I guess it depends what is official stand of BGA towards the houserules. I heard that they don't implement them unless confirmed directly with designers/publishers. Not sure if that is true.

Oct 2 nd 2025 03:16 • FrankJones • Pemaju berpendapat bahawa ia bukan idea yang baik atau nisbah kos / manfaat terlalu tinggi:

It's true. And, this is a terrible house rule.

It is rejected. The game allows players do 1 or 2 actions. It's absurd nonsense that people want to force everyone to take 2 actions.

End of discussion.

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Sila tambahkan di sini apa-apa yang kelihatan relevan untuk menghasilkan semula bug ini atau memahami cadangan anda:

ID meja yang lain / gerakkan ID
Adakah F5 meyelesaikan masalah ity?
Adapah masalah itu berlaku beberapa kali? Selalu? Sekali-sekala?
Sekiranya anda ada screenshot bug ini (amalan yang baik), anda boleh gunakan Imgur.com untuk muatnaik dan copy/paste pautan itu di sini.

Batal Kemaskinikan laporan

#108233: "House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"

Apakah laporan ini berkenaan?

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Apakah yang berlaku? Sila pilih pilihan di bawah

Sila semak apakah sudah ada laporan mengenai subjek yang sama

Penerangan yang terperinci

Laporan masa lalu

Tambah sesuatu untuk laporan ini

Tukar status laporan kepada:

Tolong

Menyumbang

Navigasi

Ikut kita